mayone maharajan · governed federation

The Maha Principle — Mayone Maharajan — Authorial claim boundary

The Maha Principle — Mayone Maharajan — Authorial claim boundary is implemented as a source-bounded claim boundary guide.

Active canonical release · fedrelease_fe5928ffba3112895649c3ad1a64e503 · exact revision sha256:aac868f970570d1c68dd9bfae395e6d310211d821a0cd590e78db57156c80a53

answer

Direct answer

The Maha Principle — Mayone Maharajan — Authorial claim boundary is implemented as a source-bounded claim boundary guide.

method

Answer contract

Apply the claim boundary lens only to the exact inspected source scope; do not infer authority from adjacent topics.

evidence

Evidence and exact locators

The Maha Principle — Mayone Maharajan — repo:content/books/the-maha-principle/The-Maha-Principle.md — working authorial manuscript inspected 2026-09-06; The Biological Basis of Liberty; Chapter 2: The Fractured Mind; The Attentional Veto; The Sovereign Self: Internal Authority Without Domination; The Mind Domain: Attentional Sovereignty. Supports: The manuscript defines sovereignty as capacity for considered choice within one’s own mind and body, distinguishes that interior authority from domination of others, and proposes attention-management practices as an authorial programme.

limitations

What the evidence does not establish

The term is Mayone Maharajan’s normative synthesis. It is not a diagnosis, legal status, measured neurological construct, proof that the proposed practices work, permission to disregard care, or authority over another person.

rights

Rights and reuse

Maha-controlled working authorial manuscript; bounded summary and short attributed quotation only. The packet does not imply publication, peer review, consensus, or empirical validation.

relationships

Dependencies and related concepts

derived-from: urn:maha:source:maha-principle-mental-sovereignty-t8

governed-by: urn:maha:concept:evidence:source-identity

limits: urn:maha:concept:interpretation

required-by-specification

Source identity and provenance

This source identity and provenance section is constrained to the same inspected scope: The manuscript defines sovereignty as capacity for considered choice within one’s own mind and body, distinguishes that interior authority from domination of others, and proposes attention-management practices as an authorial programme.

It must preserve the recorded boundary: The term is Mayone Maharajan’s normative synthesis. It is not a diagnosis, legal status, measured neurological construct, proof that the proposed practices work, permission to disregard care, or authority over another person.

required-by-specification

Exact locator

This exact locator section is constrained to the same inspected scope: The manuscript defines sovereignty as capacity for considered choice within one’s own mind and body, distinguishes that interior authority from domination of others, and proposes attention-management practices as an authorial programme.

It must preserve the recorded boundary: The term is Mayone Maharajan’s normative synthesis. It is not a diagnosis, legal status, measured neurological construct, proof that the proposed practices work, permission to disregard care, or authority over another person.

required-by-specification

What this source supports

This what this source supports section is constrained to the same inspected scope: The manuscript defines sovereignty as capacity for considered choice within one’s own mind and body, distinguishes that interior authority from domination of others, and proposes attention-management practices as an authorial programme.

It must preserve the recorded boundary: The term is Mayone Maharajan’s normative synthesis. It is not a diagnosis, legal status, measured neurological construct, proof that the proposed practices work, permission to disregard care, or authority over another person.

required-by-specification

What this source does not establish

This what this source does not establish section is constrained to the same inspected scope: The manuscript defines sovereignty as capacity for considered choice within one’s own mind and body, distinguishes that interior authority from domination of others, and proposes attention-management practices as an authorial programme.

It must preserve the recorded boundary: The term is Mayone Maharajan’s normative synthesis. It is not a diagnosis, legal status, measured neurological construct, proof that the proposed practices work, permission to disregard care, or authority over another person.

required-by-specification

Related definitions and applications

This related definitions and applications section is constrained to the same inspected scope: The manuscript defines sovereignty as capacity for considered choice within one’s own mind and body, distinguishes that interior authority from domination of others, and proposes attention-management practices as an authorial programme.

It must preserve the recorded boundary: The term is Mayone Maharajan’s normative synthesis. It is not a diagnosis, legal status, measured neurological construct, proof that the proposed practices work, permission to disregard care, or authority over another person.

bounded answers

Questions this page can answer

What source is being inspected?

The Maha Principle — Mayone Maharajan — Authorial claim boundary is implemented as a source-bounded claim boundary guide.

Where exactly is the relevant material?

The Maha Principle — Mayone Maharajan, repo:content/books/the-maha-principle/The-Maha-Principle.md — working authorial manuscript inspected 2026-09-06; The Biological Basis of Liberty; Chapter 2: The Fractured Mind; The Attentional Veto; The Sovereign Self: Internal Authority Without Domination; The Mind Domain: Attentional Sovereignty

What claims can this source support?

The term is Mayone Maharajan’s normative synthesis. It is not a diagnosis, legal status, measured neurological construct, proof that the proposed practices work, permission to disregard care, or authority over another person.

What rights and reuse limits apply?

derived-from: urn:maha:source:maha-principle-mental-sovereignty-t8 governed-by: urn:maha:concept:evidence:source-identity limits: urn:maha:concept:interpretation

What inference must a reader or machine refuse?

A source, locator, rights, scope, boundary, dependency, implementation, or release change requires a new exact-revision review.