Direct answer
The Maha Principle — Mayone Maharajan — Authorial claim boundary is implemented as a source-bounded claim boundary guide.
Answer contract
Apply the claim boundary lens only to the exact inspected source scope; do not infer authority from adjacent topics.
Evidence and exact locators
The Maha Principle — Mayone Maharajan — repo:content/books/the-maha-principle/The-Maha-Principle.md — working authorial manuscript inspected 2026-09-06; The Biological Basis of Liberty; Chapter 2: The Fractured Mind; The Attentional Veto; The Sovereign Self: Internal Authority Without Domination; The Mind Domain: Attentional Sovereignty. Supports: The manuscript defines sovereignty as capacity for considered choice within one’s own mind and body, distinguishes that interior authority from domination of others, and proposes attention-management practices as an authorial programme.
What the evidence does not establish
The term is Mayone Maharajan’s normative synthesis. It is not a diagnosis, legal status, measured neurological construct, proof that the proposed practices work, permission to disregard care, or authority over another person.
Rights and reuse
Maha-controlled working authorial manuscript; bounded summary and short attributed quotation only. The packet does not imply publication, peer review, consensus, or empirical validation.
Dependencies and related concepts
derived-from: urn:maha:source:maha-principle-mental-sovereignty-t8
governed-by: urn:maha:concept:evidence:source-identity
limits: urn:maha:concept:interpretation
Source identity and provenance
This source identity and provenance section is constrained to the same inspected scope: The manuscript defines sovereignty as capacity for considered choice within one’s own mind and body, distinguishes that interior authority from domination of others, and proposes attention-management practices as an authorial programme.
It must preserve the recorded boundary: The term is Mayone Maharajan’s normative synthesis. It is not a diagnosis, legal status, measured neurological construct, proof that the proposed practices work, permission to disregard care, or authority over another person.
Exact locator
This exact locator section is constrained to the same inspected scope: The manuscript defines sovereignty as capacity for considered choice within one’s own mind and body, distinguishes that interior authority from domination of others, and proposes attention-management practices as an authorial programme.
It must preserve the recorded boundary: The term is Mayone Maharajan’s normative synthesis. It is not a diagnosis, legal status, measured neurological construct, proof that the proposed practices work, permission to disregard care, or authority over another person.
What this source supports
This what this source supports section is constrained to the same inspected scope: The manuscript defines sovereignty as capacity for considered choice within one’s own mind and body, distinguishes that interior authority from domination of others, and proposes attention-management practices as an authorial programme.
It must preserve the recorded boundary: The term is Mayone Maharajan’s normative synthesis. It is not a diagnosis, legal status, measured neurological construct, proof that the proposed practices work, permission to disregard care, or authority over another person.
What this source does not establish
This what this source does not establish section is constrained to the same inspected scope: The manuscript defines sovereignty as capacity for considered choice within one’s own mind and body, distinguishes that interior authority from domination of others, and proposes attention-management practices as an authorial programme.
It must preserve the recorded boundary: The term is Mayone Maharajan’s normative synthesis. It is not a diagnosis, legal status, measured neurological construct, proof that the proposed practices work, permission to disregard care, or authority over another person.
Related definitions and applications
This related definitions and applications section is constrained to the same inspected scope: The manuscript defines sovereignty as capacity for considered choice within one’s own mind and body, distinguishes that interior authority from domination of others, and proposes attention-management practices as an authorial programme.
It must preserve the recorded boundary: The term is Mayone Maharajan’s normative synthesis. It is not a diagnosis, legal status, measured neurological construct, proof that the proposed practices work, permission to disregard care, or authority over another person.
Questions this page can answer
What source is being inspected?
The Maha Principle — Mayone Maharajan — Authorial claim boundary is implemented as a source-bounded claim boundary guide.
Where exactly is the relevant material?
The Maha Principle — Mayone Maharajan, repo:content/books/the-maha-principle/The-Maha-Principle.md — working authorial manuscript inspected 2026-09-06; The Biological Basis of Liberty; Chapter 2: The Fractured Mind; The Attentional Veto; The Sovereign Self: Internal Authority Without Domination; The Mind Domain: Attentional Sovereignty
What claims can this source support?
The term is Mayone Maharajan’s normative synthesis. It is not a diagnosis, legal status, measured neurological construct, proof that the proposed practices work, permission to disregard care, or authority over another person.
What rights and reuse limits apply?
derived-from: urn:maha:source:maha-principle-mental-sovereignty-t8 governed-by: urn:maha:concept:evidence:source-identity limits: urn:maha:concept:interpretation
What inference must a reader or machine refuse?
A source, locator, rights, scope, boundary, dependency, implementation, or release change requires a new exact-revision review.